top of page

Menopause Pellets: Where They Fit—and Why They’re Not My First Choice

  • Feb 8
  • 3 min read

If you’ve spent any time in menopause spaces—online, at med spas, or talking with friends—you’ve probably heard about pellet therapy.


And inevitably, the question comes up:


“Dr. T, what do you think about pellets?”


The short answer is this:Pellets are an option—but they’re not where I start.


This post isn’t about shaming pellets or the women who choose them. It’s about helping you understand where pellets fit in the larger picture of menopause care, so you can make an informed decision grounded in your goals, not hype.



What are hormone pellets?


Hormone pellets are small implants placed under the skin—usually in the upper buttock or hip area—during an in-office procedure. They most commonly contain estradiol and/or testosterone and are designed to release hormones steadily over three to six months.


Pellets are often described as:


  • convenient (“set it and forget it”)

  • long-acting

  • customized


And for some women, they do provide meaningful symptom relief.



✨ My framework: sequencing matters


When I think about menopause hormone therapy, I don’t think in terms of right vs wrong.I think in terms of sequence.


There are many ways to deliver hormones:


  • patches

  • pills

  • gels or sprays

  • vaginal preparations

  • and yes—pellets


My role as a clinician is to help you choose the right option at the right time, starting with therapies that give us the most flexibility and safety as we learn how your body responds.


That’s why pellets are not my first-line approach.



✨ Top 3 takeaways on pellet therapy


1. Pellets offer choice—but not predictability


Pellets are one way to deliver hormones, and for some women they work very well.


What gives me pause is variability.


Pellets can produce hormone levels that are:


  • difficult to predict

  • harder to fine-tune

  • slower to adjust if something doesn’t feel right


With other options—like patches or oral medications—we can start low, increase slowly, and pivot quickly. That flexibility is especially important early in the menopausal transition, when symptoms and hormone needs are still evolving.



2. Once a pellet is placed, control is limited


This is one of the most important differences.


If you don’t tolerate a pill or patch, we stop it.

If a pellet dose is too high, we can’t remove it—we have to wait for it to wear off.


That matters most with testosterone, where higher-than-intended levels can lead to side effects like:


  • hair thinning or shedding

  • acne

  • irritability or feeling “amped up”

  • voice deepening (sometimes irreversible)

  • clitoral enlargement (rare, but real)


These effects are uncommon—but when they occur, the lack of reversibility can be frustrating and distressing.



3. Pellets are best considered later—not first


Pellets may make sense after:


  • FDA-approved options have been tried

  • dosing and symptom patterns are well understood

  • expectations are realistic

  • and a woman understands the tradeoffs


At that point, pellets become one tool among many, not a shortcut or a cure-all.


This is especially important because most pellets are not FDA-approved, are typically paid for out-of-pocket, and often require frequent lab testing that may or may not change management.



Why I usually start elsewhere


At Revival Women’s Health, my priorities are:


  • safety

  • flexibility

  • personalization

  • and long-term trust


That’s why I typically begin with FDA-approved hormone therapies that:


  • allow gradual titration

  • can be adjusted or stopped easily

  • are supported by more consistent safety data


This approach lets us learn what your body needs—before committing to a longer-acting option.


If pellets become part of the conversation later, I want that decision to come from clarity, not urgency.



When pellets can make sense


I absolutely support women who choose pellets—especially when:


  • they’ve had good experiences previously

  • other approaches haven’t met their goals

  • dosing is conservative and thoughtful

  • monitoring is appropriate

  • and the decision is informed, not marketing-driven


Menopause care is deeply personal. My job is not to sell a therapy—it’s to guide a process.



Questions to ask before choosing pellets


If you’re considering pellet therapy, ask your provider:


  1. What hormones are included and at what dose?

  2. How do you prevent hormone levels from going too high?

  3. What side effects should prompt immediate follow-up?

  4. If I don’t feel well, what can we adjust—and how quickly?

  5. How are labs used to guide care (not just justify cost)?

  6. If I have a uterus, how is my uterine lining protected?

  7. What is the total yearly cost?


Clear answers matter.



The bottom line


Pellets aren’t wrong.

They’re just not where I start. And anyone selling them as a superior therapy is just plain wrong. 


Menopause care works best when we:


  • begin with flexible options

  • respond to your symptoms

  • adjust thoughtfully

  • and escalate only when needed


There is no single “best” therapy—only the best next step.


If this post raised questions or helped clarify your thinking, that’s the goal. And if you’re navigating these decisions and want guidance rooted in nuance and respect, you don’t have to do it alone.

 
 
 

Recent Posts

See All

Comments


bottom of page